3. To the auditor Page 7:
07/05/09 00:04
On page 7 is mentioned right before the sign "We have not
obtained all the information and explanations that we consider
necessary for the purpose of our audit". What was the reason for
that? Was it a problem with the directors or with the change from
HEE to MNH?
Answer:
The information that we consider necessary for the purpose of our
audit included the subsequent events review evidence that would
have supported the future trading and the appropriateness of the
going concern principle. As mentioned in the response to the first
question, the information that we lacked at the time we formed our
opinion, included:
We received professional clearance from the auditor to the 31 March 2007 financial statements, Gerald Edelman, on 4 February 2009 and there was no problem with the clearance and information given by Gerald Edelman.
We received professional clearance from the auditor to the 31 March 2007 financial statements, Gerald Edelman, on 4 February 2009 and there was no problem with the clearance and information given by Gerald Edelman.